<?xml version="1.0" encoding='utf-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/roller-ui/styles/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title type="html">NetBSD Blog (Comments)</title>
    <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/feed/comments/atom</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/feed/comments/atom" />
        <updated>2026-04-06T14:13:39+00:00</updated>
    <generator uri="http://roller.apache.org" version="5.0.3 (1388864191739:dave)">Apache Roller (incubating)</generator>
            <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_rc1_available#comment-1771432385000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 11.0 RC1 available!</title>
        <author><name>John</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_rc1_available#comment-1771432385000"/>
        <published>2026-02-18T16:33:05+00:00</published>
        <updated>2026-02-18T16:33:05+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">A few days ago I upgraded from 10.1 to 11.0 RC1 amd64 via sysupdate(8).  All worked well.

I find 11.0 RC1 just as stable as 10.1 with one noticeable improvement.

On 10.1, once in a while when streaming Audio, the stream would slowdown and get garbled for a few seconds.

On RC1, I have been streaming Audio via mplayer since I upgraded for hours on end, no issues so far.

From my experience on 11.0 RC1, I would suggest people should upgrade to it so NetBSD 11.0 will be a awesome release.

Great work NetBSD Team!
</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/gsoc2025_bubblewrap_sandboxing#comment-1764657185000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: Google Summer of Code 2025 Reports: Using bubblewrap to add sandboxing to NetBSD</title>
        <author><name>Genrikh</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/gsoc2025_bubblewrap_sandboxing#comment-1764657185000"/>
        <published>2025-12-02T06:33:05+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-12-02T06:33:05+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">I totally agree with you, Henrik. </content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/gsoc2025_bubblewrap_sandboxing#comment-1763156419000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: Google Summer of Code 2025 Reports: Using bubblewrap to add sandboxing to NetBSD</title>
        <author><name>Henrik Johansson</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/gsoc2025_bubblewrap_sandboxing#comment-1763156419000"/>
        <published>2025-11-14T21:40:19+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-11-14T21:40:19+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">What about the RUMP-kernel project? 
Couldn&amp;acute;t that encompass the requirements you addressed?
I can&amp;acute;t see any benefits of getting more dependent of the Linux community.

I would be willing to help pursuing a better NetBSD.

Kind Regards,
Henrik.</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1756999367000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 11.0 release process underway</title>
        <author><name>zilog</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1756999367000"/>
        <published>2025-09-04T15:22:47+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-09-04T15:22:47+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Noticed the native mailx MUA has gotten quite unstable, dumping core when doing basic things like changing mail directories.  Hope it gets some love before 11 gets released.</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/gsoc2025_asynchronous_i_o_framework#comment-1756590247000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: Google Summer of Code 2025 Reports: Asynchronous I/O Framework</title>
        <author><name>bbartlomiej</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/gsoc2025_asynchronous_i_o_framework#comment-1756590247000"/>
        <published>2025-08-30T21:44:07+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-30T21:44:07+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">A very interesting update. Great work!</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1756300995000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 11.0 release process underway</title>
        <author><name>kainh</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1756300995000"/>
        <published>2025-08-27T13:23:15+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-27T13:23:15+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">on 10-STABLE every time I try to record something with my microphone the system just crashes and I have to reboot my machine, I hope the next version fixes the problem</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/new_build_cluster_speeds_up#comment-1755982726000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: New build cluster speeds up daily autobuilds</title>
        <author><name>Greywolf</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/new_build_cluster_speeds_up#comment-1755982726000"/>
        <published>2025-08-23T20:58:46+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-23T20:58:46+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Mercurial is still alive?!?  I thought it was dead and buried by now, what with git and, to an extent, svn.  Glad to see that things are (finally) moving away from CVS.

I&apos;m now off to look for a git repo (as much as git grinds my gears it&apos;s probably one of the most efficient and functional SCCS out there.)</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/new_build_cluster_speeds_up#comment-1755026661000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: New build cluster speeds up daily autobuilds</title>
        <author><name>Jeff Rizzo</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/new_build_cluster_speeds_up#comment-1755026661000"/>
        <published>2025-08-12T19:24:21+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-12T19:24:21+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Thanks for the walkthrough!  I&apos;m happy to hear the build system has been updated to deal with Mercurial and git, and look forward to the shortened build times.</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754511304000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 11.0 release process underway</title>
        <author><name>yum</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754511304000"/>
        <published>2025-08-06T20:15:04+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-06T20:15:04+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Seems to install and run okay on a Gnome Boxes VM.  Might be good to make the tests set available in the beta.</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754480142000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 11.0 release process underway</title>
        <author><name>bbartlomiej</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754480142000"/>
        <published>2025-08-06T11:35:42+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-06T11:35:42+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Great news! Hoping for GPU drivers update since it&apos;s very hard nowadays to try and use NetBSD as a daily driver.

Are there plans to sync WiFi updates with what FreeBSD developed recently? Supporting higher speeds etc.</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/new_build_cluster_speeds_up#comment-1754479716000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: New build cluster speeds up daily autobuilds</title>
        <author><name>bbartlomiej</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/new_build_cluster_speeds_up#comment-1754479716000"/>
        <published>2025-08-06T11:28:36+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-06T11:28:36+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Great news! Are these build servers doing the pkgsrc package bulk builds as well? Should we expect speed improvements with providing binary packages for new pkgsrc releases?</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754425431000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 11.0 release process underway</title>
        <author><name>pacman</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754425431000"/>
        <published>2025-08-05T20:23:51+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-05T20:23:51+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">on version 9 my old graphics Radeon HD 7700 cape verde with amdgpu drivers worked great no problems but there was no sound on hdmi, on version 10 the same graphics amdgpu drivers don&apos;t work just a red line shows up on the left side of the screen and everything freezes and crashes but the sound works perfectly fine on hdmi, version 11 I tried to install on uefi but the hardware doesn&apos;t recognize the installation at all I managed to install mbr but it can&apos;t be installed pkgin and pkgsrc for now it&apos;s obvious that version 11 is still in beta phase, I hope I&apos;ll have better luck with the graphics drivers in the next release, good luck</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754322061000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 11.0 release process underway</title>
        <author><name>naguam</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754322061000"/>
        <published>2025-08-04T15:41:01+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-04T15:41:01+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Hi,

Thanks for the PVH support.
I was wondering though if the INSTALL document for evppc will be updated with the wii instructions.

Cheers,</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754317047000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 11.0 release process underway</title>
        <author><name>Jay </name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_11_0_release_process#comment-1754317047000"/>
        <published>2025-08-04T14:17:27+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-08-04T14:17:27+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Awesome news. Best of luck team.</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_1_available#comment-1740048992000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 10.1 available!</title>
        <author><name>Allwinner H3</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_1_available#comment-1740048992000"/>
        <published>2025-02-20T10:56:32+00:00</published>
        <updated>2025-02-20T10:56:32+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">it does not work under orangepi pc plus 2e</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_1_available#comment-1735159629000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 10.1 available!</title>
        <author><name>Aniou</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_1_available#comment-1735159629000"/>
        <published>2024-12-25T20:47:09+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-12-25T20:47:09+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Great!</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_1_available#comment-1734843354000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 10.1 available!</title>
        <author><name>Jay</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_1_available#comment-1734843354000"/>
        <published>2024-12-22T04:55:54+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-12-22T04:55:54+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Congratulations team.</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_1_available#comment-1734734341000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 10.1 available!</title>
        <author><name> Mike</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_1_available#comment-1734734341000"/>
        <published>2024-12-20T22:39:01+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-12-20T22:39:01+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Thanks for this gift!</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1718032215000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: X.Org on NetBSD - the state of things</title>
        <author><name>enrico weigelt, metux it consult</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1718032215000"/>
        <published>2024-06-10T15:10:15+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-06-10T15:10:15+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Since we&apos;re currently doing lots of cleanups and refactoring in Xorg - including old remains XAA in various drivers - could you please upstream your patches ?

And also let&apos;s get into closer discussions (probably @xorg-devel) on the exact relation (and workflows) of your fork vs. upstream, e.g. how to you actually create/maintain your makefiles ?</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_0_available#comment-1716090340000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 10.0 available!</title>
        <author><name>Mike</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_0_available#comment-1716090340000"/>
        <published>2024-05-19T03:45:40+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-05-19T03:45:40+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Thank you! With this release my laptop (HP Elitebook 8440p with nvidia video card) goes from largely working but with no X acceleration to fully supported with acceleration. I am extremely happy with this release.</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1715270705000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: X.Org on NetBSD - the state of things</title>
        <author><name>Constantine</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1715270705000"/>
        <published>2024-05-09T16:05:05+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-05-09T16:05:05+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">&amp;gt; not X.Org&apos;s based on GNU autotools

Huh? Autotools haven&apos;t been in the codebase for years, what are you talking about?</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1715057028000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: X.Org on NetBSD - the state of things</title>
        <author><name>Adrian Kie&amp;szlig;</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1715057028000"/>
        <published>2024-05-07T04:43:48+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-05-07T04:43:48+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Thank you for this article about Xorg in NetBSD. It was an interesting read. &amp;mdash; Adrian</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714987599000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: X.Org on NetBSD - the state of things</title>
        <author><name>Longtime NetBSD Users</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714987599000"/>
        <published>2024-05-06T09:26:39+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-05-06T09:26:39+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">&amp;quot;maybe we should evaluate whether we need all of these programs too. xmh(1) is a frontend for a mail system that isn&apos;t included in base. Together, bitmap and xmh are around 300 kilobytes.&amp;quot;

Please don&apos;t break backward compatibility.
</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714982011000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: X.Org on NetBSD - the state of things</title>
        <author><name>genv</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714982011000"/>
        <published>2024-05-06T07:53:31+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-05-06T07:53:31+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">
I liked. Helps understand NetBSD. Thanks Nia!</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714871459000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: X.Org on NetBSD - the state of things</title>
        <author><name>QwertyChouskie</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714871459000"/>
        <published>2024-05-05T01:10:59+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-05-05T01:10:59+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">I&apos;d like to see an updated post about the current state of Wayland on *BSD as well.  A *ton* has changed since 2020 in the Wayland world, with it new being the default across both Gnome and KDE (which combined, make by far the bulk majority of the Linux userbase), and I would be curious to see the state of this particular &amp;quot;shiny new squirrel&amp;quot; on the BSD side of thing ;)</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714852982000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: X.Org on NetBSD - the state of things</title>
        <author><name>Greg A. Woods</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714852982000"/>
        <published>2024-05-04T20:03:02+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-05-04T20:03:02+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Excellent write up!  Hopefully it answers some questions those unfamiliar with NetBSD might have.

I&apos;m really happy with the integration with NetBSD&apos;s build system!  It simplifies so much!

I agree xmh is unnecessary as if I&apos;m not mistaken it requires MH be installed as well.

For screen locking an import of x11/slock might be an answer.

I would disagree with removing anything else though.</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714842568000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: X.Org on NetBSD - the state of things</title>
        <author><name>Mario</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714842568000"/>
        <published>2024-05-04T17:09:28+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-05-04T17:09:28+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Nevermind, I shouldn&apos;t comment on the internet before having my coffee. My brain completely skipped this:
&amp;gt; The process of upstreaming stuff to X.Org is an ongoing process

Like, the answer was already there, I did read it before posting, but never really understood what it meant.
Anyway, glad to see there&apos;s an attempt to get those upstream, they seem like good additions to share among OSes :)</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714842292000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: X.Org on NetBSD - the state of things</title>
        <author><name>Mario</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/x_org_on_netbsd_the#comment-1714842292000"/>
        <published>2024-05-04T17:04:52+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-05-04T17:04:52+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">I wonder why some of the more general NetBSD improvements haven&apos;t been incorporated upstream (say EXA support for some drivers, or the pointing device). Is it a manpower issue? A lack of interest on either side? Philosophical differences with the project? The expectation for them to come and take it rather than you pushing it upstream?</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_9_4_released#comment-1714212013000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 9.4 released</title>
        <author><name>Edgar</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_9_4_released#comment-1714212013000"/>
        <published>2024-04-27T10:00:13+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-04-27T10:00:13+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Thanks a lot!</content>
    </entry>
        <entry>
        <id>https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_0_available#comment-1714062824000</id> 
        <title type="html">Re: NetBSD 10.0 available!</title>
        <author><name>Andreas</name></author>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://blog.netbsd.org/tnf/entry/netbsd_10_0_available#comment-1714062824000"/>
        <published>2024-04-25T16:33:44+00:00</published>
        <updated>2024-04-25T16:33:44+00:00</updated> 
        <content type="html">Hello how can I install KDE Plasma in NetBSD?

Greetings Andreas
</content>
    </entry>
    </feed>

